91download.com supports a wide range of platforms, including YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Dailymotion, Reddit, Bilibili, Douyin, Xiaohongshu and Zhihu, etc. Click the download button below to parse and download the current video
Have you ever wondered who owns the vast expanse of the cosmos beyond our planet? The question may seem absurd, but for one man, Gregory W. Nemitz, it was a claim worth making. He registered ownership of an asteroid, 433 Eros, estimating its value at a staggering 492 quintillion dollars in platinum. But what happens when the lines between reality and cosmic aspirations blur?
Nemitz's audacious move was met with a surprising turn of events when NASA landed a probe on his "property," which he humorously dubbed "parking space number 29." He even sent NASA a parking ticket for the inconvenience. However, both NASA and the US Attorney General dismissed the fine, deeming his claim legally baseless.
The question of space ownership is a complex tapestry woven with international treaties and uncharted legal territories. While organizations sell land on celestial bodies like the Moon, Venus, and Mars, the reality of owning extraterrestrial property is far from straightforward. The 1979 Moon Treaty explicitly states that no one can own any part of outer space, but only 11 states have signed it. However, the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, signed by 129 nations, declares that outer space is not subject to national appropriation, leaving the door open for private ownership.
Historically, explorers claimed ownership of lands with the backing of powerful nations, often overlooking the presence of indigenous populations. In the context of space, the power dynamics are even more complex. Without the recognition and support of a sovereign nation, private ownership in space is largely symbolic. The challenge of defending such a claim without the backing of a powerful entity is a formidable one, especially when the Outer Space Treaty positions outer space as the common heritage of mankind.
The ambiguity surrounding space ownership has implications for space exploration and development. The Antarctic Treaty, upon which the Outer Space Treaty is based, aimed to prevent international discord over the continent. This lack of profit incentive has led to minimal activity in Antarctica compared to the resource boom in the Arctic. If space were more accessible and secure for private entities, would we see orbiting tourist attractions and lunar hotels today?
Currently, the tangible possessions we can claim in space are the objects we place there and, to a certain extent, the orbits they occupy. The Outer Space Treaty ensures that anything we leave in space remains the property of the original owner. However, orbits are a different matter, requiring permission from the International Telecommunication Union and active use to maintain the claim.
The concept of ownership extends to the hypothetical scenario of encountering alien life. If an alien landed in your backyard, would shooting and consuming it be considered hunting or murder? The lack of alien rights and the cultural implications of such an act present a profound ethical dilemma.
The Moon, Earth's closest celestial neighbor, has intrigued humanity for centuries. The first person to touch the Moon with bare hands was a NASA technician named Terry Slezak, who accidentally got lunar soil on his hand. But in a broader sense, every Homo sapien who has walked on Earth has come into contact with lunar material, as cosmic dust from the Moon and asteroids falls to Earth regularly.
In conclusion, the question of space ownership is not just a legal maze but also an ethical conundrum that challenges our understanding of property, power, and humanity's place in the cosmos. As we continue to explore the final frontier, the answers to these questions will shape the future of space law and our relationship with the universe.
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook