91download.com supports a wide range of platforms, including YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Dailymotion, Reddit, Bilibili, Douyin, Xiaohongshu and Zhihu, etc. Click the download button below to parse and download the current video
Sanctions against Russia have been a topic of heated debate, with many questioning their effectiveness in curbing the country's ability to finance its ongoing conflict with Ukraine. Recent revelations suggest that despite a myriad of sanctions, Russia has managed to earn a staggering 700 billion euros from fossil fuel sales since the war began. This article delves into the loopholes that have allowed such revenue, the impact of these sanctions, and the potential for a stronger, more effective strategy.
The figures are undeniably shocking, yet they reveal a paradox. Sanctions have hit Russia's export revenues, reducing them by approximately 12%, or 3.4 billion euros per month. However, these measures have not disabled Russia's war machine. The question arises: have these sanctions been sharp enough, or have they merely scratched the surface?
One of the primary reasons for the sanctions' limited success lies in their loopholes. Russia has found legal avenues to sell crude oil to countries like India, China, and Turkey, which then refine it into diesel, jet fuel, and other oil products. These products are then sold to countries that have imposed sanctions, including the UK, EU, and USA. This legal yet morally questionable practice allows Russia to maintain a significant portion of its export revenues.
Western nations have been cautious, fearing that stricter sanctions could lead to price spikes and increased energy costs. However, this fear may be unfounded. The EU's reliance on Russian fossil fuels has led to a situation where companies continue to buy from Russia, increasing their reliance on its resources. The summer of 2022 saw a stark example of this, with household gas bills in Europe soaring by over 200% when Putin cut the gas pipeline.
One specific area of concern is the flow of jet fuel from refineries in India to the UK. These refineries use Russian crude oil, and despite the legal nature of their operations, there is a pressing need to crack down on these flows. Banning the import of oil products from these refineries could incentivize them to source crude oil from non-Russian suppliers.
Sanctions are often slow to take effect, with a significant transition period between announcement and implementation. This slow pace works in Russia's favor, allowing it to continue selling fossil fuels and financing its war efforts. The urgent need to combat this has become increasingly clear, especially as each day sees the EU sending more money to Russia.
Despite the sanctions, Russia's export volumes have remained relatively stable. However, the need to sell through new routes and offer discounts to new buyers has taken a toll on its export revenues. The EU has leverage in certain areas, such as LNG, where Russia's export revenues are significantly impacted by EU actions.
Carve-outs have allowed Russia to increase its export revenues, particularly in countries like Hungary, where imports of Russian oil have surged. These carve-outs were intended to give countries time to reduce their reliance on Russian fossil fuels, but progress has been slow.
The shadow fleet, consisting of aging tankers, poses both an environmental and economic risk. These tankers often lack proper safety inspections and insurance, potentially leading to catastrophic oil spills. The recent sanctioning of 11 shadow tankers by the UK is a step in the right direction, but more needs to be done to stop these vessels from transporting Russian oil.
The effectiveness of sanctions against Russia remains a contentious issue. While they have had some impact on the country's export revenues, they have not disabled its ability to finance its war on Ukraine. Closing the loopholes and enforcing stricter measures could potentially make a significant dent in Russia's export revenues, but it requires a coordinated effort and a willingness to accept higher energy costs in the short term. The clock is ticking, and the need for a stronger, more effective strategy is urgent.
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook