91download.com supports a wide range of platforms, including YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Dailymotion, Reddit, Bilibili, Douyin, Xiaohongshu and Zhihu, etc. Click the download button below to parse and download the current video
Imagine a mathematician, armed with an infinitely sharp knife and a perfect sphere. She proceeds to slice and distribute the sphere into an infinite array of boxes, only to reassemble these pieces into five distinct sections. With a deft touch, she rotates and rearranges these sections, defying all logic, to form not one, but two identical, flawless spheres. How is this possible?
This intriguing scenario introduces us to the Banach-Tarski paradox, a mathematical result that challenges our perception of reality. The paradox lies not in the logic or the proof, both of which are impeccable, but in the tension between mathematics and our real-world experiences. Within this tension, we uncover fundamental truths about the nature of mathematics itself.
Before we delve deeper, let's consider the bedrock of every mathematical system: axioms. Every system is constructed using logic to derive new conclusions, but logic requires a starting point. This starting point is provided by axioms, basic statements we accept as true without proof. Axioms serve as the foundation for mathematical structures, much like the ground beneath a house. By altering this foundation, we can create entirely different yet equally valid structures.
For instance, Euclidean geometry is built upon the premise that only one parallel line can pass through a point not on a given line. However, by removing this axiom, mathematicians have developed spherical and hyperbolic geometries, each valid and useful in different contexts.
Enter the Axiom of Choice, a pivotal concept in modern mathematics. It plays a crucial role in proofs involving the selection of elements from sets, which we'll simplify as marbles in boxes. The Axiom of Choice ensures that our selections are consistent, even when dealing with an infinite number of boxes and indistinguishable marbles. This mysterious "chooser" allows mathematicians to proceed with confidence, even in seemingly impossible scenarios.
Our slicing mathematician encounters a point in the Banach-Tarski proof where she must deal with infinitely many boxes filled with indistinguishable parts. The Axiom of Choice becomes her ally, enabling the construction of the five sections necessary for the paradoxical duplication of the sphere.
Should we reject the Axiom of Choice due to its counterintuitive outcomes? Mathematicians argue against it, as it underpins many important results in fields like measure theory and functional analysis, essential for statistics and physics. While it may lead to impractical results, it also yields extremely practical ones.
The question for mathematicians is not whether an axiom is right or wrong, but whether it is appropriate for their specific purpose. The Banach-Tarski paradox hinges on this choice, showcasing the freedom mathematics affords us. It allows us to model our physical universe using axioms derived from daily experiences and to explore abstract mathematical universes with unique geometries and laws.
If we ever encounter extraterrestrial beings, axioms that seem absurd to us might be their common sense. To explore this possibility, we might present them with an infinitely sharp knife and a perfect sphere, and observe their reaction. In doing so, we may discover that the true power of mathematics lies in its ability to challenge our perceptions and expand our understanding of the universe.
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook