91download.com supports a wide range of platforms, including YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Dailymotion, Reddit, Bilibili, Douyin, Xiaohongshu and Zhihu, etc. Click the download button below to parse and download the current video
Have you ever wondered why the International Criminal Court (ICC) has suddenly become the epicenter of global diplomatic tensions? In a historical first, multiple countries are attempting to block arrest warrants for individuals suspected of war crimes, all within two short months of Prosecutor Karim Khan's request. The targets? None other than the Israeli leader, his defense minister, Yav Galant, and three Hamas leaders. But why the sudden urgency?
The UK, Germany, the US, and others are striving to stop or delay these warrants, while countries like Norway, Spain, and South Africa are backing the case. The ICC, however, maintains that it will not be swayed by political pressure. This raises an intriguing question: Is the ICC truly impartial, or is it influenced by the weight of international politics?
Historically, the ICC has been steadfast in its mission to protect the judicial process from any external pressures. However, this resolve seems to be tested as the court shifts its focus to prosecuting Israeli leaders. Despite sanctions against the ICC prosecutor, she has remained undeterred, proceeding with what she believes is the application of the law. Reports even suggested that an arrest warrant against Netanyahu was imminent, but arguments from Germany and the UK about the court's jurisdiction have now delayed the process.
Removing Israelis from Palestinian jurisdiction could potentially lead to a dangerous precedent. If Israelis are not prosecutable by either the Palestinians or the ICC, it could allow them to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity with impunity. This international law expert calls the argument tenuous, predicting that the arrest warrant will only be issued a few months later than expected. In contrast, the warrant against Russian President Vladimir Putin was issued in just a month, with no country intervening.
The decision to allow 64 interventions in the case against the Israeli leader highlights its political sensitivity. Despite the lack of legal merit in the UK's submission, the pre-trial chamber took it seriously and is set to delay the process by several months. This delay buys time for those with power but raises concerns about the court's effectiveness and fairness.
The ICC has long been criticized for being a "Colonial Court," focusing predominantly on African war criminals. However, Prosecutor Khan hopes that the case against Netanyahu will send a clear message: Nobody is above the law. Yet, the countries and organizations defending the Israeli leader seem to be ignoring this message, leaving us to wonder about the future of international justice.
Stay tuned for the latest developments in this unfolding drama. Make sure to subscribe to our channel to get the latest news and insights from Al Jazeera.
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook