The worst year for banks since 2008 | FT Film

91download.com supports a wide range of platforms, including YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Dailymotion, Reddit, Bilibili, Douyin, Xiaohongshu and Zhihu, etc.
Click the download button below to parse and download the current video

The video belongs to the relevant website and the author. This site does not store any video or pictures.

full-width:100%;background-color:#ffffff;;}># The Unraveling of Silicon Valley Bank: A Modern Financial Fiasco

In the most tumultuous period for the global banking sector in 15 years, panic was palpable. Friends and family sent worried text messages, the likes of which I hadn't seen since the 2007-2008 financial crisis. It all started with an announcement from a bank, and then all hell broke loose.

The scenario was complete carnage; chaos reigned. One day, a bank was alive, and the next, it was gone. This tale echoes the 'madness of the crowds,' a term that describes how people can behave irrationally in groups, leading to massive panics. The situation was so dire that I hadn't felt that kind of gut-wrenching fear since the crisis of 2007 and 2008.

The roots of this debacle can be traced back to the era of zero interest rates, a time when central banks around the world kept interest rates low to stimulate the economy after the global financial crisis. This policy made risky, high-growth start-ups seem like a safe bet, leading to a surge in start-ups and venture capital investments. Silicon Valley Bank became the de facto bank for these tech companies, funding mortgages, loans, and hosting events that connected investors and entrepreneurs.

SVB had more cash than it knew what to do with, so it invested in long-dated bonds offering higher interest rates in a low-interest environment. However, when interest rates rose sharply due to factors like the Russia-Ukraine conflict and inflation, the value of these bonds plummeted, and SVB was left with substantial losses.

Regulations that had been relaxed for 'mid-sized' American banks, like SVB, meant they were not subject to the same stress-tests as larger banks. This allowed their issues to go undetected until it was too late. When SVB's CEO, Greg Becker, was asked about their long-dated securities, he remained calm, even as the value of those bonds decreased dramatically.

The tech boom was coming to an end, and companies that once had access to vast amounts of venture capital were running out of cash. Start-ups began to withdraw their funds from SVB to stay afloat, which exacerbated the bank's problems. When SVB announced a $2 billion loss from selling $20 billion in securities to cover deposit outflows, panic spread, and a self-perpetuating bank run ensued.

SVB's collapse was stunning in its speed. One moment, the bank was operational; by the next midnight, it was defunct. This rapid unraveling raised questions about the stability of other banks, leading to a ripple effect that impacted even the perception of well-established banks like Deutsche Bank.

In the aftermath, the US government stepped in to backstop all deposits, ensuring no one would lose money due to SVB's collapse. While this may have prevented a more significant crisis, it also highlights the continued risks in the financial system. The resilience of the system in 2023 is commendable, but it's a reminder that the risks have merely shifted to less regulated areas, such as shadow banking.

As we reflect on this modern financial fiasco, it's clear that while the system has become more robust since 2008, the risks remain. Regulators must remain vigilant, ensuring that the lessons of Silicon Valley Bank are not forgotten and that the financial system is truly resilient against future shocks.

Currently unrated