91download.com supports a wide range of platforms, including YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Dailymotion, Reddit, Bilibili, Douyin, Xiaohongshu and Zhihu, etc. Click the download button below to parse and download the current video
Donald Trump's selection of JD Vance as his running mate has sparked a firestorm of reactions, ranging from skepticism to outright disdain. Described as "creepy," "weird," and "out of touch," Vance's nomination has left many wondering if he's the right person for the job. Polls indicate that his favorability ratings are at an all-time low since the 1980s. What's causing this stir, and is there more to Vance than meets the eye?
JD Vance, the Ohio Senator known for his staunch anti-abortion stance, has recently faced criticism for comments he made about Vice President Kamala Harris and women without children. His remarks have only added fuel to the debate, leaving many within and outside the Republican party questioning Trump's pick.
But is the vice presidential candidate truly a deciding factor in an election? Greg Swinson, chair of the Republicans Overseas UK, joins us from Colorado to shed some light on the matter.
Swinson argues that historically, the vice presidential candidate has had minimal impact on the election outcome, citing the exception of John F. Kennedy's selection of Lyndon B. Johnson in 1960. "I don't think that the vice presidential candidate really matters that much," he states.
So, what makes Vance a viable choice? Swinson believes that Vance appeals to Trump loyalists and younger voters. At 39 years old, Vance's youth is seen as a draw for young men who are increasingly supporting the Republican party. Additionally, his Ohio roots may help secure votes in the critical swing states of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.
Despite these advantages, Vance's nomination has caused a rift within the Republican party. Some traditional conservatives are disappointed with his more populist views and his support for bigger government. "It's a party of the big tent," Swinson counters, emphasizing the need for different opinions within the party.
At a time when party unity is crucial, the question remains: can Vance's image be revamped to overcome this division? Swinson points to the recent Republican convention in Milwaukee, where he observed a strong sense of unity. "The party was very unified and he was announced as the candidate," he notes.
The media, Swinson argues, plays a significant role in shaping public perception. Both President Trump and Vice President Harris are flawed candidates, yet the unity within the party was evident at the convention. "Even though both candidates have challenges, President Trump is not going to have the media on his side," he explains.
As the election looms, the true impact of JD Vance's nomination remains to be seen. While his controversial remarks and low favorability ratings have sparked debate, the question of whether he can unify the party and appeal to a broader audience is yet to be answered. In the world of politics, only time will tell if Vance's enigmatic presence will be a boon or a bane for the Republican party.
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook