91download.com supports a wide range of platforms, including YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Dailymotion, Reddit, Bilibili, Douyin, Xiaohongshu and Zhihu, etc. Click the download button below to parse and download the current video
From the outset, it's crucial to ponder upon a pressing global issue that has sparked debates for decades: the legality of Israel's continued presence in occupied Palestinian territories. But what if I told you that this presence is not only controversial but also deemed illicit by a court of law? Let's delve into the intricacies of this matter.
The International Court of Justice, in its ruling, asserts that Israel's violations of the prohibition on the acquisition of territory by force and the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination have a direct impact on the legality of its continued presence in the occupied territories. This raises an immediate question: How does this presence persist, despite such violations?
To understand this, we must look at Israel's abusive and persistent utilization of its position as an occupying power. By annexing occupied Palestinian territories and imposing permanent control over them, Israel not only violates the fundamental principles of international law but also renders its presence in these territories illicit. Isn't it intriguing how a state can act in contravention of international norms and yet maintain its occupation?
Furthermore, the Court's conclusion that Israel's continued presence in the occupied territories is illicit is a stark reminder of the responsibility that states bear for their actions. This is not a fleeting or isolated incident but a continuous violation caused by the breach of the prohibition on the acquisition of territory by force and the denial of the Palestinian people's right to self-determination. This leads us to ponder: What are the implications of such a violation on the global order?
Israel, through its policies and practices, has committed these violations, and as a result, it bears the obligation to end its presence in the occupied territories as soon as possible. But the question remains: Will Israel heed this call, or will we continue to witness the perpetuation of an illicit occupation?
As we conclude this exploration, it's imperative to reflect on the gravity of the situation. The Court's ruling doesn't just declare Israel's presence illicit; it also underscores the need for adherence to international law and the respect for the rights of the Palestinian people. It's a call to action, not just for Israel but for the international community at large. Will we stand by and watch, or will we take steps to ensure that justice is served and the rule of law is upheld? The answer to this question will shape the future of international relations and the quest for peace in the occupied Palestinian territories.
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook