91download.com supports a wide range of platforms, including YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Dailymotion, Reddit, Bilibili, Douyin, Xiaohongshu and Zhihu, etc. Click the download button below to parse and download the current video
The trade war between the United States and China has been a contentious issue, with tariffs playing a pivotal role in shaping the economic landscape. The recent postponement of steep new tariffs on imports from China raises questions about the direction of US trade policy. Are these tariffs a mere political maneuver, or do they signify a deeper shift in industrial strategy?
The Biden administration's decision to delay tariffs on Chinese imports was announced with much fanfare. However, the tariffs are likely not going away. Instead, they represent a strategic pivot towards supporting key sectors in the US, such as semiconductors and clean energy. This approach, combining carrots (tax incentives) and sticks (tariffs), aims to reduce dependence on China and encourage domestic manufacturing.
The tariffs, including a 100% tariff on electric vehicles, a 50% tariff on solar cells, and a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum, are designed to discourage imports of critical materials and goods from China. The impact of these tariffs is expected to be minimal in the short term, with full effects not realized until 2025 and 2026. This gives the US time to build up its capacity in these sectors.
While the tariffs may seem significant, their actual impact is largely symbolic. The US already imports very few electric vehicles and other targeted goods from China. The inflationary and growth impacts are marginal, adding only a basis point to inflation and subtracting a similar amount from growth.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that Trump's 2018 tariffs cost the typical household an additional $419 per year. This suggests that consumers will indeed feel the impact of tariffs, especially in consumer goods. However, the current tariffs are more targeted towards high-tech manufacturing and mineral sectors, meaning the pass-through to inflation as felt by consumers is less significant.
The global trade landscape is on the road to recovery post-pandemic, with cooling inflation and rising demand. However, the IMF has warned that trade restrictions could shrink the global GDP by 7%. While the Biden tariffs are small and targeted, they could still create winners and losers on a global scale. China stands to lose the most, but other countries, particularly in Asia, could benefit as the US builds up capacity in these strategic sectors.
Historically, China has retaliated to tariffs but usually in a less than proportional manner. Instead of matching tariffs one-for-one, China may take other measures, such as weakening its currency or restricting tourism to the US.
In conclusion, the delayed tariffs and the broader trade war between the US and China represent a complex interplay of political strategy and industrial policy. While the immediate impact may be limited, the long-term implications for the global economy are significant. As the world watches, the question remains: will these tariffs lead to a fundamental shift in the US-China trade relationship, or will they simply be a temporary blip in the economic landscape?
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook