91download.com supports a wide range of platforms, including YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Dailymotion, Reddit, Bilibili, Douyin, Xiaohongshu and Zhihu, etc. Click the download button below to parse and download the current video
The investigation into the thwarted assassination attempt on President Trump has unveiled a chilling detail: the gunman had been flying a drone over the rally site for 11 minutes prior to the shooting. This revelation, among others, has raised critical questions about security lapses and the evolving nature of such threats.
Imagine the scene: a crowd gathered, anticipation building, and then, a drone silently hovering overhead. The gunman's use of a drone to scope out the rally area is unprecedented, and it happened just two hours before he opened fire. But what time of day was it? And why wasn't this activity detected by security?
According to FBI Director Christopher Wray, the shooter was observed flying a drone around the rally area between 3:50 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. This raises the question: was this a casual flight, or a deliberate act of surveillance? The answer is chillingly clear—this was a calculated move to understand the layout and security measures in place.
The investigation has also uncovered three explosive devices, two in the shooter's vehicle and one at his residence. These devices, while relatively crude, had the capability to be detonated remotely. However, the critical detail here is that the explosives were not in an "on" position, rendering the attempted remote detonation futile.
Despite the failure to detonate the devices, the potential for disaster was very real. The shooter had a transmitter on him at the time of his death, indicating that he was prepared to trigger the explosives from a distance. The fact that the explosives did not detonate is a stark reminder of the thin line between tragedy and fortune.
The lack of detection of the drone and the subsequent oversight in monitoring the shooter's movements are now under scrutiny. Security should have been vigilant, especially in an environment where public figures are involved. The gunman's ability to fly a drone over the rally site for an extended period is a stark failure of security protocols.
The confusion and lack of coordination evident in the aftermath of the shooting are further evidence of the need for a more robust security framework. The absence of a central command post and the disjointed response to the shooter's presence on the roof highlight the gaps in current security practices.
The attempted assassination of President Trump and the subsequent revelations about the shooter's actions serve as a wake-up call for security forces worldwide. The use of drones for surveillance and the potential for remote detonation of explosives are modern threats that require immediate attention and a reevaluation of security strategies.
As we reflect on these events, we must ask ourselves: are we truly prepared for the unseen threats that lurk in the shadows? The answer to this question could determine the safety of public figures and the general public in the future.
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook