91download.com supports a wide range of platforms, including YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Dailymotion, Reddit, Bilibili, Douyin, Xiaohongshu and Zhihu, etc. Click the download button below to parse and download the current video
In the heart of Al Riyadh, just outside Abu Dhabi, a bold claim is being made. This is the epicenter of a technological revolution, where carbon capture and storage (CCS) is said to be leading the world in combating climate change. But a pressing question looms: Can the very oil and gas companies that have contributed to our environmental mess be part of the solution?
Instead of cutting back on fossil fuel production, some countries are advocating for capturing the emissions that drive global warming. While renewable energy sources like wind and solar are the darlings of the green movement, polluting industries are betting on CCS as a viable alternative to reduce greenhouse gases in the atmosphere by 2050.
The Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) is venturing into uncharted territory by partnering with Omani startup 44.01 to inject dissolved CO2 into seawater into rocks near the surface, where it will mineralize. This is a pioneering project for the UAE, and while it's still in its infancy, it holds the promise of a cleaner future.
Despite the optimism, there are significant challenges. CCS is still an experimental field, and the technology is far from being able to capture the amounts of CO2 needed by 2030. Moreover, the cost of developing these projects is substantial, and the storage of carbon dioxide remains a concern.
Climate experts argue that CCS should not be used as a借口 to produce more oil and gas. The key to solving the climate crisis is reducing emissions, which means phasing out coal and oil. Carbon capture should be reserved for industries that are essential to our economy but difficult to decarbonize, like cement and steel manufacturing.
The cost of CCS technology is currently high, but there is potential for it to become more affordable with time and investment. The lack of a carbon price has been a significant barrier to investment in CCS over the past few decades. However, as Europe and other regions recognize the need for pricing or regulation to address higher emissions, there is a growing incentive to invest in these technologies.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) has estimated the sums required to develop CCS at scale. While it could play a crucial role in certain sectors, it's a fallacy to believe that CCS will allow the oil and gas industry to continue business as usual while meeting Paris Agreement targets. The investment required is orders of magnitude higher than current levels.
The fossil fuel industry must recognize that the world is shifting towards cleaner energy sources. With renewables being cheaper and cleaner, the industry has an opportunity to help itself by cleaning up its operations and capturing methane leaks.
Carbon capture may be part of the solution to reducing emissions, but it is not a panacea. The world needs to cut emissions in half by 2030, and while CCS can contribute, it will not be the sole key to limiting global warming. The clock is ticking, and the time for action is now.
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook